Showing posts with label Management. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Management. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Darden Lawsuit - Servers give this a look

Well, not just servers, but especially servers.  Normally I'd consider ambulance chasers to be poor form, but I'd love to see Darden kicked squarely in the balls (repeatedly) on this one.  Keep in mind that Darden cannot punish you for joining the lawsuit.  The lawsuit that would be incurred from that action is something they won't play with.

This lawsuit includes Capital Grille, Red Lobster, Olive Garden, Longhorn Steakhouse & more.



Have you been the victim of unfair labor practices while working for a Darden Restaurant?

Consider joining the class action lawsuit. 

Know Your Rights, You Have Options.

Many of the almost 168,000 restaurant workers at The Darden Restaurant Group, the world’s largest restaurant group, earn wages below the minimum wage — with tipped minimum wages as low at $2.13 an hour and non-tipped wages as low as $7.25 an hour. In addition, many workers are not compensated for time that they work off-the-clock or are not paid appropriate overtime wages. This lawsuit provides Darden’s current and former servers the opportunity to join together and seek back wages owed to them for the time spent doing general maintenance or preparatory duties that they performed for less than minimum wage. Learn More>


From the FAQ:

1. What is this lawsuit about?
This case is about whether Darden failed to pay tipped employees such as servers the wages that they were entitled to under the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act. Plaintiffs allege that they were required by Darden to work off the clock, both before and after their assigned shifts. Plaintiffs also claim that Darden directed them and other servers to perform work that would not generate tips such as general maintenance and preparatory duties without paying proper wages for such work, and that Darden failed to pay appropriate overtime wages.

2. Who can be a part of this case?
People who were and/or are employed at the following Darden restaurants nationwide as a tipped employee (such as a server) at any time from August 2009 to the present: The Olive Garden, Red Lobster, Longhorn Steakhouse, and the Capital Grille.  Even if you no longer work for Darden, you may still participate if you worked at one or more of these restaurants after August 2009.

3. Why should I participate in this lawsuit?
You may be owed back pay. Our lawsuit claims that Darden required tipped employees, such as servers, to do general maintenance and/or preparatory type work for which those employees did not earn tips and were not paid minimum wage.  The goal of this lawsuit is to require Darden to pay its employees for all of the work they performed. You do not have to participate in this lawsuit.  However, if you decide not to become a part of the case,  you will not be able to share in any recovery that may be awarded.

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Restaurants Opportunities Centers United - Diners Guide

Download the PDF here if you haven't already.

Why this guide exists:


With over 10 million workers nationwide, the U.S. restaurant industry is one of the largest and fastest-growing sectors of the American economy, even during the current economic crisis. Unfortunately, despite the industry’s growth, restaurant workers suffer under poverty wages and poor working conditions. In particular, the industry suffers from:

1 LOW WAGES 
With a federal minimum wage of $2.13 for tipped workers and $7.25 for non-tipped workers, the median wage for restaurant workers is $8.90, just below the poverty line for a family of three. This means that
more than half of all restaurant workers nationwide earn less than the federal poverty line.

2 NO PAID SICK LEAVE
90% of the more than 4,300 restaurant workers surveyed by the Restaurant Opportunities Center (ROC) report not having paid sick leave, and two-thirds report cooking, preparing, and serving food while sick, making sick leave for restaurant workers not only a worker rights issue but a pressing concern in public health!

3 OCCUPATIONAL SEGREGATION 
Women, immigrants, and people of color hold lower-paying positions in the industry, and do not have many
opportunities to move up the ladder. Among the 4,300 workers surveyed, we found a $4 wage gap between white workers and workers of color, and 73% reported not receiving regular promotions on the job.


More on ROC United here.  Just because you are the little man, doesn't mean you are alone.  If your state isn't on the map, contact ROC and do something about it.



“When you go out to eat, you shouldn’t get wage theft, racism, and sick cooks
in the kitchen, along with your meal. How the food tastes at a restaurant really
doesn’t matter, if the people who work there are being mistreated.
This guide will help you separate the good guys from the bad.”
–ERIC SCHLOSSER, author of Fast Food Nation





“No matter how good the food, how local the ingredients, no one wants to support a
restaurant that takes advantage of its workers. It is possible for restaurants do the right
thing and make money. ROC promotes that high road to profitability. ROC’s work helps
people like you and me find restaurants that are doing the right by their workers.”
–JOSH VIERTEL, Founder and President, Slow Food USA

Saturday, December 10, 2011

I think Mad Money's Jim Cramer reads my blog

Saw this among some of my stock reports that came in yesterday (via CNBC) and I literally laughed out loud:

Friday, December 16
Darden Restaurants [DRI  43.21    0.13  (+0.3%)   ] reports before the bell, and Cramer wants to hear a recognition that something is structurally wrong that management needs to address, or we need new management. This is a name that pays you to wait, but Cramer is nervous the company has lost its way.

 
"...nervous the company has lost its way" - this gets a no shit sherlock from me.  I've been beating that drum for quite some time - like say 5 years.  FUBAR is what it is, and leadership is what it isn't.

Glad I liquidated my DRI a while ago.  Too many eggs in that basket for me at the time, and the writing is on the wall that unless something changes the slow steady decline will increase in pace.  I buried that money into some gold that I just recently got out of and made a nice fat pile to invest elsewhere that I think has a better future upside than gold.

No, I'm not giving you stock tips.

But I will say that I find Jim Cramer very entertaining, and generally a good source for intelligent investing philosophy advice.  Pay limited attention to the specific stocks he talks about and capture his overall mindset and you can do pretty well in today's market if you are patient and not blindly gambling.

Anyone got in-roads to the Zynga IPO they want to share with me?  I promise I won't hold onto my shares long.  (Cramer is dead on right on this too & is mentioned in the article as well).

I only have two real stock market regrets - not buying a ridiculous amount of Google at $150 when I had the chance, and selling a dead cat immediately before a sizable bounce.  I could've cut my losses on the dead cat by 60% had I waited 2 weeks.  Oh well, it's part of the game.

Friday, December 04, 2009

Red Lobster needs a transfusion

Below are some ideas/quotes from the book The Starbucks Experience. Many of these illustrate quite painfully why Red Lobster's senior management really needs an infusion of quality and creativity. In spite of being 3 years old every Red Lobster manager should get a copy of this book.

  • “People want to do the right thing, they want to create and offer quality things, they want to do good in the world, and if you give them the opportunity and the resources to do so, they will shine.”
  • “Starbucks consistently spends more on training than it does on advertising.”
  • “I have worked in horrible places, and it’s hard to do a good job when you hate the company.”
  • “What are you doing to encourage the discovery of the unique needs of those whom you and your colleagues serve?”
  • “Rather than waiting for cues from the home office, everyone at Starbucks is charged with searching for new and better ideas for meeting and exceeding customer needs.”
  • “Leadership has created the expectation that partners are to be involved in improving Starbucks and has gone the extra step of creating a culture in which partners expect to be heard when they offer ideas.”
  • “While great leaders spend most of their time looking at big-picture, strategic opportunities, they cannot overlook the systems and training necessary to ensure the quality of every aspect of the company’s products, services, and processes.”
  • “When the economy turns bad or business hits a rough patch, training and education budgets suffer. This short-term financial fix often compromises the long-term health of the company.”
  • “Starbucks leadership understands that playful and positive work environments produce vital and engaged staff members.”
  • “Every company’s brand, is nothing more than the sum total of the individual actions its people take.”
  • “Consumers want the predictable and consistent, with an occasional positive twist or added value thrown in.”
  • “Many companies focus too much on the basic ingredients and not enough on adding that extra something that differentiates them from their competition and builds brand loyalty.”
  • “With consistency comes customer trust. Consumers gain stability when they know that they can depend on having a reliable experience.”
  • “If, at the end of each day, you and your colleagues have invested the extra energy to delight others rather than simply satisfy them, you will ultimately be rewarded with extraordinary results.”
  • “Because of the amazing diversity found within this country, some communities may have unique requirements that are quite different from those of neighborhoods only a few miles away.”
  • “We are often too close to our own ideas to objectively evaluate their viability.”

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Reader Writes In - Stupid Store Policies

The following was submitted to the Lobsterboy for my review and feedback. I asked (and was given) permission to publish it. Names have been changed to protect the guilty...err...innocent. I will add suggestions I shared with the author at the very end. Fax this in to your local Red Lobster!

************************

To Whom it May Concern,

At some point in everyone’s life, they face certain critical decisions. Where to live, what education to pursue, what God to worship, whether or not to pull the plug on Grandma, etc. For some time, I have felt that I was facing one of these critical moments.

For several years, I have worked at Red Lobster. In fact, I've worked pretty hard at being a good Lobsterhead in the time that I've been there. Minus smoke-breaks (an unfortunate and necessary evil considering my addictive nature) I'm usually, pardon the phrase, "hauling ass". I make people laugh. I sell them booze. I bring them food. According to our strange social custom of tipping, I also take whatever money they decide to leave in excess of the obligatory bill and use it to pay for my own vital needs (see also, "beggar").

In addition to answering the strange demands of my guests, pampering their egos, and providing food and entertainment, I answer to the every whim of my managers as well. I clean and tidy until their hearts are content, labor to keep their stress level low by not "riling up the natives", and generally try to be agreeable no matter which flavor of corporate bullshit I'm being asked to eat that week. Need me to add yet another annoying line of dialogue to my already twenty minute table approach? "Hi! I'm Boner, I promise to take sweet, sexy care of you today! Do you give a shit about our Fresh Fish today though I’ve told you ten times before? Are you under any time constraints? What? I already made you late getting back to work?" Sure! Okay! Need me to suffer the brunt of some “from on-high” evil cost-cutting corporate ways? "I'm sorry sir, we no longer have teaspoons. Yes, we still have tea. Yes, that is ridiculous. Yes, you will be allowed to bring your own spoon from home, or we can stir it with our dirty fingers. Whichever you'd like." Whatever you say management, you'll appreciate my hard work later. Right? Eh... Right?

While many of the servers I've seen come and go at our restaurant couldn't have found their ass with both hands, ran around like there was a four-alarm fire on top of their heads every time they got double sat with a couple of two-tops, or couldn't shake off their drug-induced stupor long enough to bring an old woman her water with lemon in under twenty minutes, I've always felt that I have been fairly competent at my job. Perhaps this has to do with the fact that I try to always be "working" when I am at "work". Because of my perception that I do my job well, I have always assumed I would be acknowledged as what we call a "good employee".

In their infinite wisdom, however, our management has promoted a policy of fairness at work. "Fairness" in this context, is similar to another concept you may have heard of before: Communism. Don't shit yourself just yet, I'll explain. While most things in America have traditionally been "merit based", particularly in a corporate environment, our management sees things differently. We reward mediocrity every day. If you happen to be bad at your job, our management is incapable of firing you. They just can't bring themselves to do it. If one person chooses not to do any work, they can safely assume that someone else will come and do it for them, with no fear of actual reprisal from a manager. Fifteen guest complaints? No problem! Don’t show up for your scheduled shifts? No problem! Now, on top of all of this, our management will also ensure that those same lazy servers have just as many hours as you. To keep it fair.

This concern for fairness also extends to which sections we can work. Do a great job every day? Suck it! We need to be fair about who gets what section. We sure wouldn't want anybody to feel bad. In addition to having to wade through a sea of people texting on their phones, fixing their tables so that we don't have to deal with the customer's plaintive and hungry stares, and generally cleaning up after everybody who was too lazy or slow to do their own job, we now have to be concerned with the equitability of the situation. I'm pretty sure management is going to start checking my pay stubs and forcing me to redistribute or burn all the extra money I make so that our less than stellar servers don't have to feel bad. Great.

In a strictly capitalist work environment, productivity would be rewarded. In a communist work environment all people are rewarded equally, regardless of their contribution. You see, Red Lobster has more in common with Red Russia than good ol' Red White and Blue America. Since I agree with this new corporate standpoint, I have some suggestions which may help bring us closer to our communist aspirations.

#1 - Do away with "The Brig", and add "The Gulag". Because it is necessary for the new "Red" Red Lobster to maintain some level of output from all of its employees, the forced labor camp theme of our new room will help "reeducate" our bad employees. You can't fire all the lazy people. But you can force them to stay on the clock for free until they can figure out how to refill the glass racks in the alley. Douchebag Dan comes highly recommended for the position of taskmaster.

#2 - Vodka will be on tap. It helped keep the Russians happy in the freezing Siberian winter, and it will work for us too. Having a bad day in section 1? Have some Vodka! Getting two shifts a week? Have some Vodka! There is no amount of bullshit that a bottle of vodka and a rousing song won't help you forget. (AMEN!)

#3 - Red Lobster will actually pay for my rent and food now, regardless of the pay cut that I take in the interest of fairness. Can't make any money because management won’t cut the fat? Don't worry, Communist Red Lobster will take care of all of your needs! Bread lines for everyone!

#4 - Big Furry Hats. With Lobsters on front.

An alternative to all of this, however, would be to require everyone to do their jobs. America-style. Hosts will host, servers will serve, and managers will manage. That includes firing people that don’t do their job. Glasses and ice are perpetually empty? Write the server up! Then fire them when they do it again! Busser doesn’t know how to clean a table, but has been working there three years? Fire them, and give their hours to someone who wants to work!

Nobody who does their job should ever have to apologize to someone who doesn’t for getting “special treatment”, so long as that “special treatment” is merit-based recognition for a job well done. A good schedule and a good section isn’t a reward. It makes sense from both an ethical and a business perspective. Good employees = happy guests. If I’m wrong, then perhaps we should ask Marlene if she wants to work backup on a Friday night, or Donna if she wants to roll silverware. That’s the equivalent of asking a strong server to work a bad station. These people don’t have the jobs they have because they are special, they have them because they are hard workers. If anybody doesn’t understand that, they should question whether or not they are doing their jobs the way they should. Or maybe they are just Commies.

Thus, my aforementioned critical decision. Do I put up and shut up? Or do I search for new employment? Alternatively, I could just start having fun with the job, and see how long it takes for someone to notice that I’ve gone postal. Or I could plead with my management to grant me something that I rightfully earned to begin with. I suppose that every server who works hard should be pondering the same decision. Perhaps we could all just start a revolution instead…

Signed,


The Democratic Lobster League of America

P.S. We only write this because we care.

*********************************

Here are my responses and ideas to add to the above: I'd add a line about hard working people in this economy can't find work and we've got people with jobs who won't do work - I think there is a solution. :-)

BTW, I'd fax it to your regional director as well - if you don't have his/her fax # it'll be in the office where the fax is, often on a business card tacked to the wall.
The solution to this problem is to have a GM who has an eye on a higher position. When the GM's nose is so far up corporate leaders asses that all they see is brown, this crap doesn't happen. It does mean you goose-step to mindless corporatism, but they strictly adhere to the "law". I've experienced both, and while both are evil, I'll take the corporate brown-nosers if I have to pick my poison.

And if you really want to go commando you can sneak into the office and fax this to corporate from your RL's fax machine! If your store is anything like ours they leave that office open frequently, and long enough it wouldn't be hard to do it without getting caught. They have to fax so much crap that few of the managers would even bother looking what was spooling through unless there was only 1 manager in the store.

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Inept Managers In Training


It cracks me up to see idiot managers flame out. Not good managers mind you, the idiots. One of the worst things for crew morale are managers who can’t grab their own ass with both hands. An experienced staff member can smell incompetence from a mile away. When a new manager comes in, bragging about all their years as a manager of some other dumpy chain (Denny’s, Perkin’s, Waffle House would be some prime candidates), you worry. Then when they back up that concern with incompetence you really worry. Especially if you are the person training them. I’ve trained a lot of people in my years, and only a few of them were 100% incompetent in serving food. Some might be at the 25% level, which is bad, but with a lot of practice, diligence, and good training they will eventually figure it out. But when you have no personality, are afraid of customers, and are too lazy to do the basic components of the job you are being trained for, that is a problem. And it is an absolute train wreck when you are a manager in training. How do I kindly inform my GM that I wouldn’t put you in a section with only a 1 top for you to serve? What am I to tell the regional director, who I've known for more than a decade, when I have to explain he hired a completely inept tool? I don't want to ruin your career, but there's no way in hell I'm turning you loose in another Red Lobster.

Wednesday, January 02, 2008

When customers complain

This isn't about legit customer complaints. There are certainly times where customers have a very valid complaint. This is about that other 10-15%.

It cracks me up sometimes when I hear customers complaining. The other night I witnessed a manager pulled to the side by a customer. This manager then had to listen to an inappropriate and out of place diatribe by this nutjob customer. The manager then had to placate this idiot. Thankfully it was one of the "good" managers - by good I mean someone who doesn't buy into the corporate Gestapo like mind washing that the customer is always right. This customer was an asshole and an idiot. So our good manager walked over to the server whose skills were called into question, talked to them for a minute informing this server that the customer complained about how she was doing her job correctly, thanked her for doing her job correctly, informed her that said customer is a complete tool, and then went onto other manager duties. It was really, really funny. Too bad there aren't more managers with the sack to take one for the team. I've seen corporate robots (aka Lobsterbots) take complaints on things that the server did correctly, then turn around and berate the server because the customer bitched. Even though the server did their job right. Anybody else see how this is not motivating to the crew?

It is simply amazing that having people skills is not a requirement to become a Red Lobster manager. It is even more tragic that spinelessness is a valued trait in this corporation. Our company needs to grow a sack, take it's balls back, and empower the local management teams to actually use common sense once again. Red Lobster used to have some good managers, but as the years have passed, fewer and fewer of them have come through the system. The pay is competitive, so are the benefits, so you have to suspect that it is something else that is keeping the quality leadership away (and those remaining fleeing!) from this company.

The problem is leadership by BOHICA. Bend over here it comes again. Red Lobster managers are trained that BOHICA is their way of life for 60 hours a week until they die or leave. That is a quality corporate environment (sarcasm). And those who get really good at it and have perfected the second tool in the managers arsenal - the ass kiss - then get promoted to General Manager. Once you have refined your ass kissing technique, they then begin to consider you for other leadership positions in the area, region, or on the national corporate level.

What a screwed up system. Give me 4 managers who know right from wrong, their heads from their asses, and I'll give you a quality leadership team that will run a store the right way. Having quality local management would lead to better staff throughout the restaurant. This would lead to better service, happier guests, increased profit and bonuses for all. But somehow Red Lobster has decided this is too costly. They'd rather chew through the incompetent managers. They'd rather train the quality ones and watch them walk to greener pastures elsewhere.

BOHICA!

Friday, February 23, 2007

Idiotic corporate policies


I'm going to rant for a bit. If you don't like my rants, skip this (and most) posts.

The Red Lobster 3 table policy.
We, as RL Servers, are limited to three tables max at any given time. It can be three 1-tops, or three 7-tops, but only 3 tables. It makes no difference if one table has been sitting in your section for 3 hours, you cannot take another table. If you have two one tops sitting in your section reading books all afternoon, you will only have one table that you can wait on. If some people are working on business, a couple buying a house for instance, are sitting in your table all afternoon looking through paperwork, you cannot take an additional table. If a guy decides he wants to read the whole newspaper during rush in you section you cannot take another table. If your tables want to sit and watch the game (if you are in a RL with Bar tables and TV's) you cannot take another table. During the World Series, we would have tables sit for hours. Think we made any money? It is an asinine policy. It has cost each and every one of us money, except for those who make these kind of decisions. Did the Corporate leaders loose money when we made this switch a year and a half ago? Nope, they certainly didn't. It's easy to screw with things when it's not your livelihood you are screwing around with.

The 3 table policy does not take into account server skills. We have some people that I would testify before congress should never have more than two tables. We have a couple of middle aged women who between the two of them would struggle to maintain 3 tables at a level I can hand 5 or 6 tables. It's less about me being good and more about them sucking BTW.

Another thing that pisses me off is that if a mid-afternoon person wants to leave after their guests have paid, but while the guests are still seated in our restaurant, they can have another employee watch/clean up that table. So now the other employee can have their own 3 tables, and be babysitting 4-10 tables depending on how many sitters and servers we have that day. But could that employee watching 8 tables actually take a 4th table, certainly not. Do those tables that sit there for the next two hours still require service - yes, though admittedly a diminished amount. This is the case every single day of the week. This same scenario plays out at the end of every shift. Come in late at night and you might see 10 tables in the restaurant with guests, but only 2 servers in the store. Red Lobster only applies their policy when it is to their advantage. By letting those other 2-4 servers go before their tables leave they save labor hours, they are getting servers off the clock. I understand the servers wanting to leave early as possible, that isn't the issue. The issue is the double standard employed by Red Lobster.

Another place this 3 table rule makes no sense is in the bar. Bar Tenders do not have the same limits as do servers. A bar tender might have 12-20 sitting along the bar on a busy night eating and drinking. Plus they have at times other tables they are responsible for. In addition to that, they are supposed to be making drinks for the servers. If their choice is to take care of their own guests eating the 2 Ultimate Feasts and drinking a few cocktails (likely netting them a $10+ tip) or getting the drinks for the servers, they are going to choose taking care of their own guests at the expense of the server. They are likely to only make $10 all night for their service to that server. So the servers get to stand their waiting while the bar staff runs around taking care of themselves. Further, the bar tenders do not have the table service training that servers do. Watching a bar tender take a table is painful. They don't have table approaches. They don't know the menu. And this is our long tenured bar staff, not even the new people.

Splitting large parties
If a table has 8 or more guests, two (or more) servers are required. A table of 4 adults and 4 sets of breast feeding twins (12 people) requires 2 servers. If 16 people come, only one orders a meal and the rest just drink water 3 servers would be required. If a retirement party of 22 people comes in for drinks and appetizers you have to have 4 servers. Not only does this policy jack us as servers, it causes increased wait times for virtually every table of 8 guests or more during a busy period. Now not only do you have to wait for tables to open up, but you also have to wait for all the servers involved to have an open table before the table can be seated. So when a table of 15 people shows up, they have to wait for all 3 servers to have open tables. Our large party wait times have increased substantially the past year and a half.

The further insanity is that if you are just starting your shift - this happens frequently on weekends - you can come onto the floor an be sat a party of 6 or 7, and two four tops simultaneously. But you cannot take that 8 top by yourself. We have sections where when servers aren't on in adjacent sections it is possible (and it happens) that people get sat two 5-tops and a 4 top all within two minutes of coming on the floor. Do you think it is harder to deal with 10 people at one table or 10 people at 3 tables? At the 10 top everyone can listen to the same table presentation, everyone is going at the same general pace. Not so at three separate tables. Do you think Red Lobster is going to go on a wait to give you enough time to take the order of the 7-top before they bring you the other two 4-tops? Nope. In spite of their idiotic 3 table policy, Red Lobster DOES NOT want to go on a wait. They will seat overly busy bartenders instead of asking guest to wait in the lobby with empty tables in full view. They will allow guests to seat themselves at the bar rather than make them wait for a server with an open table.

Related Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

The Geldings

From Wikipedia:

A gelding is a castrated animal—in English, a castrated male horse. The word comes from the Old Norse geldr ("barren"). A horse is usually gelded to make him more placid, making him easier to control. Geldings were once prized by classical steppe warriors for their silence.

Red Lobster more and more is in the practice of hiring people for their management teams who are geldings. The less personality you have the better. The further you are willing to stick your head up the corporate ass the further you will go. I understand being a company man, when that company is a good company that will stick by your side through thick and thin. But Red Lobster/Darden does not meet that qualification. I've seen idiot managers shown the door for a lot of good reasons, but I've also seen some great people come and go for reasons that are absolutely absurd. Petty things, things that were I to explain you'd be left scratching your head too.

If you aren't one of the gelded managers, your life quickly becomes a corporate game of whack-a-mole. If you don't watch out, the Darden hammer will smack you back down into your place. And worse, your fellow managers who no longer have their own balls are watching you, waiting for you to screw up. Not a positive work environment. I appreciate my current management team for the most part (we have one manager who would buy dehydrated water if Red Lobster said they were selling it that I could probably live without). But I am tired of the turnover. Having to continually learn a new managers peccadillo's every few months is very tiresome. It's bad enough to have a staff turnover of 50-70% to deal with on an annual basis.

Red Lobster spends a lot of time, money and effort to train people, but they haven't yet figured out how to retain the good ones. At the end of the day, if the leadership - local on up - reach their bonuses, they don't really care about how it impacts us as a staff. Red Lobster has potential. It was once a great company. But it is going to take someone with some huevos to take us there, and I don't honestly think that person exists in our current system. So we are relegated to continuing on down a bland path, with uninspiring leadership. We will continue to be led by drones who huddle around restaurant magazines celebrating a 1% gain in market share. We will continue to be guided by the bottom line with no consideration for the impact on the average employee. We will continue to be treated in ways which remind us at every opportunity that we are all replaceable. And we will continue to just get by, which in my books is not the right way to run a business of any size.

Related Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,